• Welcome to The Corporate Insider

    Welcome to The Corporate Insider, a website for workers, consumers, shareholders, academics and members of the press. This site is the internet's resource center for all who are impacted by corporate conduct.

    Recent history has demonstrated that wrongful conduct by corporate insiders can have a devastating impact on corporate stakeholders and observers. From securities fraud which adversely impacts the value of stock to short cuts in the manufacturing process that result in defective products being injected into the marketplace, corporate conduct can be devastating. Yet, it is not so much the conduct of the corporation itself that can be problematic as much as it is the conduct of the corporate insiders who, often times guided by their own self-interest, abuse their corporate mandate to the detriment of stakeholders. In addition to shareholders and consumers, workers lose out when basic wage and hour, benefit, and job safety laws are skirted. Insider wrongdoing has eroded the integrity of many publicly traded corporations, and layoffs and plant closings have caused rising unemployment and the destruction of local economies.

    Why do corporate insiders skirt the law and their obligations to stakeholders? One answer is that misguided executive compensation plans often reward insiders for short term corporate performance as measured by the value of the stock. If not paying workers overtime pay or cutting corners on product safety means profits in the short term, executives who want to see larger year-end bonuses will take the short cuts. While executive compensation plans should be written to properly incentivize insiders, stakeholders can have a real impact by knowing the laws that regulate corporations and taking action to enforce them. These laws range from securities laws to consumer and labor laws. With this in mind, this site has been developed with the intent of providing an overview of the laws that regulate corporate conduct.

and another thing . . .

The Tragedy of the Clemens
Federal prosecutors have indicted former baseball star pitcher, Roger Clemens, for lying to Congress about his alleged use of steroids.

Whether Roger Clemens took steroids and whether, if he took steroids, his statistics need to be placed in a different light undoubtedly is proper banter for the sports pages.

This country has...
Read more...
 

Latest Stats

  • Consumer Price Index
    Unemployment Rate
    Payroll Employment
    Avg. Hourly Earning
    Producer Price index
    Employment Cost index
    Productivity
    U.S. Import Price Index
    Unemploy. Initial Claims
    UI Claims 4-Week Avg.
    Federal Min. Wage

    +0.3%
    9.6%
    -54,000
    +$0.06
    +0.2%
    +0.5%
    -0.9%
    +0.2%
    472,000
    485,500
    $7.25

    7/10
    8/10
    8/10
    8/10
    7/10
    2Q 10
    2Q 10
    7/10
    8/28/10
    8/28/10
    Current

 
Articles:
  • Corporate Integrity Agreements: Asking the Companies to Police Themselves, Please
    The use of a corporate integrity agreements (“CIA”) in resolving the prosecution of pharmaceutical and medical companies is commonplace. As part of a deferred prosecution agreement, the U.S. Department of Justice, or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Inspector General, will ask the defendant corporation to enter into a CIA to police its behavior and, in part, ensure compliance with the terms of the settlement.
    Read more...

Corporate Insider News:
Two NY Accountants Charged With Conducting Ponzi Scheme Against Clients PDF Print E-mail

Washington, D.C., July 22, 2010 — The Securities and Exchange Commission today charged two certified public accountants with fraud and is seeking an emergency court order to freeze their assets after they sold phony securities to investors and then stole the money for personal use.

The SEC alleges that Laurence M. Brown and Ronald Mangini, who reside in Westchester County, N.Y., took the name of an inoperative company owned by a client of their accounting firm and sold investors fake promissory notes and common stock in what they purported to be a profitable company operating a gas pipeline in Tennessee. They falsely touted themselves as senior officers of the company, which they proclaimed to have a captive market in its area and a stable minimum rate of production with quality gas that could be sold well above market prices. What Brown and Mangini concealed from investors was that the pipeline had been inoperative for more than a decade. Behind the scenes, Brown and Mangini were instead operating a Ponzi scheme and diverting investor funds into their personal bank accounts and those of family members.

Brown and Mangini not only deceived investors into making investments in a pipeline that was not producing any gas at all, but they stole the identity of a company owned by a client in order to do it," said George Canellos, Director of the SEC's New York Regional Office. "Brown and Mangini also victimized and betrayed the trust of other accounting clients who invested in their scheme."

According to the SEC's complaint, filed in federal court in Manhattan, Brown and Mangini began selling common stock and promissory notes of a company called Infinity Reserves-Tennessee Inc. as early as April 2008. They peddled the phony securities to clients of their accounting practice and other investors. Without authorization from the client who solely owned Infinity Reserves, Brown and Mangini used the company name to sell the stock and notes. Brown and Mangini falsely represented themselves as senior officers of Infinity Reserves with authority to sell the securities, calling themselves "president" and "secretary-treasurer" respectively. The phony notes promised investors a 10 percent annual return that would be paid semiannually on the principal amount of the investment.

According to the SEC's complaint, Infinity Reserves owns one principal asset — a gas gathering and trunk pipeline system located in Tennessee that it has not operated for more than a decade. The offering document that Brown and Mangini provided investors falsely portrays the investment as interests in an active system with an interconnect into the Duke Energy main east-west trunk line. The offering document falsely explained supposed merits of the investment and made various untrue statements while assuring investors that Infinity Reserves enjoyed a captive market in its area, a stable minimum rate of production, and quality gas that could be sold at a 20 percent premium over market prices. The offering document did not tell investors that the pipeline had been inoperative for years and thus in reality had no market for its gas and no minimum rate of production.

The SEC alleges that Brown and Mangini illegally obtained more than $2.1 million from investors. In classic Ponzi scheme fashion, they returned approximately $136,000 to certain investors in the form of interest payments. At least $1.6 million of investor funds were transferred to personal bank accounts controlled by Brown, Mangini, or family members including Mangini's wife and Browns's wife and daughter. The family members are named as relief defendants in the SEC's complaint for the purposes of recovering investor funds in their possession.

The SEC's complaint charges Brown and Mangini with violations of the anti-fraud provisions of the federal securities laws, Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and Exchange Act Rule 10b-5. In addition to the emergency relief, the SEC's complaint seeks permanent injunctions, disgorgement of the defendants' and relief defendants' ill-gotten gains plus prejudgment interest, and financial penalties from the defendants.

In addition to the SEC's charges, the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York today brought criminal charges against Laurence Brown concerning the same illegal activities alleged in the SEC's complaint.

Brown is a repeat securities law offender. In 1994, the SEC charged Brown with, among other things, violations of the antifraud provisions of the federal securities laws in connection with another offering fraud. Brown was enjoined from future violations of those provisions and barred from associating with any broker, dealer, government securities broker or dealer, investment company, investment adviser, or municipal securities dealer.

 
< Prev   Next >